And here are my impressions of what happened last night (by the way, “debate” is in quotes because these dog-and-pony shows hardly qualify):

Guys who looked good:

John McCain
demonstrated why, regardless of the fact that he’s got some issues I can’t abide, the man is a true patriot and knowledgeable, and would make, IMHO, a nice running mate for Mike Huckabee (I can hear some of you screaming at me right now). He shredded Flip Flopney on waterboarding, and Ron Paul on Iraq. And he’s right on both issues; I’ve decided that as a Christian, I can’t support waterboarding. Call me a weenie; I don’t care. McCain is right on this issue, and he came across really strong.

Mike Huckabee came off as the most affable candidate, but that’s old news, of course. His only stumble, which Tancredo seized upon, was his answer on space exploration. With his fiscal policy being his only Achilles heel that I can see, his answer there opened a door he didn’t need opened. But he came off quite presidential in all of his remarks; he isn’t going to change what he believes to please you or me, or to get elected. I like that.

Guys who looked bad:

Flip Flopney. I really thought he weaseled around on the torture thing, though he did have some nice moments.

Fred Thompson. He wouldn’t be in this category if not for the inane decision to run, as his commercial, an attack ad against Huck and Flip. This wasn’t the place for doing that, and it made him look cheesy. Nice answer on immigration, though.

Mixed-bag guys:

Rudy. The man basically lied about Flopney’s house being a “sanctuary mansion”, and that was cheap. At the same time, he’s got an impressive record in NYC, and he accented it well.

Ron Paul. You know, he says a lot of things that are spot-on; he’s at his best when talking about getting the government out of our lives. But when he talks about Iraq, he can’t seem to distinguish between the fact that, in retrospect, we shouldn’t have gone in, and what we need to do now that we are there. He seems to justify “let’s get out” with “we shouldn’t have gone in”. No, Ron, it doesn’t work that way, and you look like a doof when you try to go toe-to-toe with McCain on this one.

Guys who don’t belong on the stage:

Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo. Guys, you both have nice points to make, but the handwriting has been on the wall for awhile, and everybody seems to know it but you. You’re clogging up the stage. You’re taking up space and time. Throw your support behind somebody else, and go back to being effective House members. Now. Time’s up; out of the pool, boys.

Awful performance:

CNN and Democrats. Anderson, if there are eight candidates on the stage, then give them some semblance of equal time. Get somewhere in the ballpark; don’t ask guys to come up there on the platform just to witness the Flip and Fred and Rudy Show. And putting a mic in the hands of the homosexual general? What in the world was that about, particularly now that we know who that dude was.

And the Democrats lose by virtue of two things: one, there were four or five guys on that Republican platform with better experience and better ideas and better willingness to come clean than almost any of the Dem candidates (with the possible exception of Bill Richardson, whose ideas stink). Two, and more importantly, your gutlessness in being unwilling to have a debate on Fox News is transparent. CNN is a lefty-leaning organization (and some of the questions that were chosen help in that assessment, as was the decision to give the mic to the general), but the Republicans went into that situation nonetheless. The next president is going to be dealing with real bad guys, like al-Zawahiri and bin Laden and Ahmedinejad, and those nutjobs, and you weaklings don’t have the courage to deal with Fox News.

Yeah, you’re ready to lead the country…like I’m ready to quarterback the Colts.

UPDATE: I promise I didn’t see this article until after I wrote this post, but Time Magazine agrees with me.

And by the way, that’s the correct way to put it: Time agrees with me. đŸ™‚

3 responses »

  1. Pistol Pete says:

    Huckabee showed his quick wit in response to the question – “What would Jesus do about the death penalty?” His response? “Jesus is too smart to ever run for public office.” Brilliant. And refreshing to see he can take his fatih seriously yet still have a sense of humor. I’m not into politics, but I may just go register Republican so I can vote for him in the primary.

  2. Rich Paul says:

    I think you’re entirely wrong on Iraq

    The fact that we should not have gone in is a wonderful reason to get out now.

    The fact that American soldiers are within striking distance of enemies who have no long range attack capability is a wonderful reason to get out now.

    The fact that any day a soldier spends defending Iraq he cannot spend defending America is a wonderful reason to get out now.

    The fact that any day a soldier spends defending Iraq he cannot spend hunting down and killing Osama bin Ladin is a wonder reason to get out now.

    The fact that we are not just finishing the waste of our original investment, but wasting more resources every day we are there is a wonderful reason to get out now.

    The fact that we are approaching bankruptcy is a wonderful reason to get out now.

    And lastly, the fact that the longer we stay there, the more people will be willing to actually attack us is a wonderful reason to get out. The question is not whether people would hate us were we not there, and spread out over the rest of the middle east, and propping up Israel. The question is whether their hatred would overcome simple human inertia. For a few, it probably would. But the reality is, people who are not forever under attack are generally too busy actually living to be bothered blowing themselves up … regardless of the number of imaginary virgins that may be involved.

  3. Byron says:

    Rich (and you’re not related to RON Paul, are you?),

    I can certainly respect that viewpoint, as I can respect Ron’s, but I view it as wrong, only because of two things: one, we don’t want to leave Iraq in a worse condition than if we finish the job, and two, there seems to be good evidence that we’re finishing the job. I’m eager for troops to come home; I questioned the wisdom of Iraq prior to us going in. I’m not, in short, a particular fan of this war, and I do see Ron Paul’s points, to a point, but I don’t think that cutting and running now is the best solution, even though you do make some valid points.

    Thanks for posting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s